Foster Care

Professor Pastrana English 1-20 September 28, 2009 Cargon, love, nurturing, and nonhing more As we turn and learn, the only people we truly trust are our family. Our family is so-called to teach, love, and nurture us; they should provide us with safeguard and care. When a father carries all these attributes, why should anyone second-guess his situation in his childrens lives? Richard Wexlers article Panic in Foster premeditation, says, Gerardo R. was a loving father who always cared for his children, but when his break up wife lost delay of the children, Gerardo R. did not win cargo hold both because of insufficient housing conditions.(A27) I do not condition with the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family services decision in Gerardo Rs bailiwick that income should plant whether the parent is fit to raise his children. Society has been evolving and changing for centuries, but who would afford thought children would be taken from their reta in parents for no ethical reason? Gerardo R. was denied not only handle but also the right to read his children. He was a normal American who worked hard but apparently it was not sufficient enough to gain custody of his children.

What truly determines whether a father is capable for providing his children with basic necessities? In my opinion, if the father has a home, job, and can provide his children with love, then what more is needed? Gerardo should dedicate received legal custody of his children or at least(prenominal) the probability to communicate with them. He did not abuse or put down his children, so why did they deny his right to see or talk t! o his children? Although this article does not go into across-the-board detail, the patent points Jreisat 2 tell the lecturer that the only reason he was denied his... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay