is livy an accurate historian?

Does Livy have a consistent hackneyed of historical true statement in Books 1-5? In books 1-5 of the Ab Urbe Condita, Livy sets shore in lucubrate the foundation of Rome and tells the story compensate through to the flog by the Gauls in 390BC. Livy draws on a number of sources to frame his history and is the only superannuated writer to attempt the consummation of writing Romes history on such a guanine scale. As Mellor reminds us, `no other ancient historian make up attempted a history of the strange past on anything like this scale. For this he can be commended hugely. However, despite his complete(a) nature, spanning 142 books in total, the reliability of Livys work is for certain a publication for conjecture. In this essay I willing focus upon the verity of Livys work as well as his consistency as an historian, with a view to determining whether Livy has a consistent monetary standard of historical accuracy or non. Indeed Livy demonstrates his skill as a historian, clearly cover his knowledge by including specific dates, names and places. We argon habituated highly specific information on the census in 465bc at 3.3, as well as interesting detail over the differing spellings of Furius at 3.5.

The names of the consuls for each year be almost always stated with confidence, and the chronological structure of the books adds come along weight to its sense of accuracy. Mellor shows his wonder for Livys work, and suggests its accuracy in explaining that ` irrelevant many of his predecessors he did not embellish he legends with additive fictions. He furthers his support stating that sluice if there are errors, they are `relatively fe! w for the size and scope of the book. I take that this is an important point that essential be taken into grievance when assessing... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay